Tag: jewish

The End of Days? Apocalypse Cow Born in Israel

By Ryan Lau | @agorisms

Recently, the Temple Institute in Jerusalem announced the birth of a rare red heifer cow. According to the institute, if the calf qualifies, it would be the first “red heifer in 2000 years”.

An Apocalypse Cow?

Christianity and Judaism both state that the birth of a pure, unmarked red heifer calf spells the beginning of the end of the world. With a potential apocalypse cow born, the institute now must undergo vigorous screening of it. If the calf has any marks or blemishes, then it is not pure, and thus, cannot be the sacrificial animal that the religions’ sacred texts promise.

The Temple Institute is a non-profit Jewish religious group based out of Israel. Their main goal is to create the biblical Third Temple on Mount Moriah in Jerusalem. According to sacred texts, after the tenth red heifer in history is sacrificed, the people can begin building the temple.

The Red Heifer’s Religious Heat

However, the Islamic Dome of the Rock currently lies on Mount Moriah. In order to construct the Third Temple, they would first need to destroy the original structure. So, in order for this to occur, the Jewish community would first need to come to a consensus that the organization had truly found the right heifer. This, though, may turn out to be more difficult than it sounds, because they also would be bulldozing a major Muslim religious monument. And Islam, though similar to the other two monotheistic religions in many ways, does not recognize the red heifer as a symbol of judgment day.

Since 2015, the Temple Institute has been breeding cows in attempts at bringing about a red heifer. Though they have not resorted to genetic engineering, it is, of course, true that breeding knowledge is vastly more advanced today than in biblical times. Thus, it is not explicitly clear whether or not the cow would count, if it did not come about its conception through natural methods.

On the other hand, though, some may argue that the manipulation of animal lineage may necessitate judgment day, or at the very least, not disqualify it. In order for the construction of the temple to begin, the current owners of the Dome would need to agree to demolish it. Yet, it is highly unlikely that the Ministry of Awqaf Islamic Affairs and Holy Places would do so.

High-stakes Conflict

Unfortunately, this refusal would likely stir up much more controversy. In recent years, Israeli leaders have threatened to take back the territory for Judaism. Only last year, the Jewish Temple movement stated officially that “We must liberate the Temple Mount from the murderous Islam”.

With a belief of the world’s end in play, these tensions would only skyrocket. Though they have threatened to tear down the Dome in the past, an important event such as the red heifer may be enough to prompt swift action. Muslims, though, having just lost a major religious monument, would surely retaliate if this was the case.

Without a doubt, the apocalypse cow has the chance to stir up some major religious controversy. If left unchecked, it could worsen the already horrific relations between Israel and Palestine, or even start a larger religious war. And unlike past religious wars such as the Crusades, Israel has nukes now. Other nearby nations are also hoping to attain them, so such a war could cause irrevocable consequences.

On Facebook, the institute officially declared the birth of the calf, but have yet to provide further information. Whether or not this calf can be the apocalypse cow may make or break hopes of peace between bitter religious rivals in Israel and the rest of the world.

Get awesome merchandise and help 71 Republic end the corporate duopoly by donating to our Patreon, which you can find here. Thank you very much for your support!

Featured Image Source


The Toxic Cocktail of Identity Politics

By K. Tymon Zhou | United States

In the United States, there are various demographic groups. There are inequalities in these groups. Our society’s cultural attitude towards such groups remains high debated. A thought experiment may illuminate this issue:

Imagine a hypothetical demographic group in the United States. This group is relatively small, constituting 1.9% of the population.  Despite this group’s status as a minority, it is fairly affluent: 46% of this group earns more than 100,000 dollars a year. By way of comparison, a mere 18% of Americans fall into this category. Moreover, this group is highly educated. 59% of the adults in this group have a college degree compared to the 27% of American adults as a whole.

How do you react to these statistics? Most people would react positively to this group’s success. They would see it evidence that the American Dream is real, that such a minority could succeed.  However, there are those who would resentfully respond that this group is oppressing others through their successes.

This group isn’t hypothetical; it’s American Jews. How could this be? Rampant antisemitism, thankfully, has faded. Yet, it occasionally raises its filthy face even in contemporary American life.

Shockingly, it manifests itself from the left, the supposed defenders of tolerance. In 2011, an Occupy Wall Street protestor carried placards with “Google: Jewish Billionaires” and “Google: Zionists Control Wall Street”. Another example occurred in 2017 at the University of Chicago, where a leaflet angrily declared,”Ending white privilege begins with ending Jewish privilege.”  Borrowing progressive language , it asks,”Is the 1% Straight White Men? Or is the 1% Jewish?”  To be completely fair, such examples are isolated. However, it speaks to the inherent toxicity of the progressive left’s identity politics.

Identity politics is defined as “politics in which groups of people having a particular racial, religious, ethnic, social, or cultural identity tend to promote their own specific interests or concerns without regard to the interests or concerns of any larger political group.”  It perceives the world through a zero-sum lens. There are the oppressors and the oppressed. This is no third party.  This is the stance adopted by the progressive left especially in regards to “privilege”.

Nian Hu, an opinion writer at the Harvard Crimson, expressed the concept as follows:

Privilege is the idea that society grants unearned benefits to people because of certain aspects of their identity. And, on the flip side, there is oppression—the idea that society disadvantages people because of certain aspects of their identity. Privileged people, therefore, benefit at the expense of oppressed people.

How can one cease being an oppressor? According to Hu, you cannot. By simply belonging to a “privileged” group, you are an oppressor.

…I am an oppressor. As a cisgender and heterosexual person, I benefit from the oppression of LGBT people. As an able-bodied person, I benefit from the oppression of people with disabilities. The power structures of heterosexism, cissexism, and ableism grant me unearned benefits at the expense of LGBT people and people with disabilities.

If you are a member of a “privileged” group, woe be unto your soul! No amount of tolerance can liberate you from your status as an “oppressor”

From this logic, we begin to see the dark path that leads to leftist Antisemitism. If you are wealthy and well-educated, you are an oppressor.  Many Jews fit this description.  Are they oppressors? Should they declare that “We are oppressors. As Jews, we benefit from the oppression of non-Jewish people.”? Such a monstrosity belongs to the deranged delusions of Adolf Hitler, not America!

American democracy is not built on such sentiments. It’s built on compromises between groups, not a zero-sum game. These groups set aside their differences to pursue a better life for all. This tolerant spirit is what lead to the miracles of Philadelphia, obtaining independence and forming the Constitution. The various colonies (and later states) had various identities. Despite such differences, they found unity. As Patrick Henry nobly declared, “The distinctions between Virginians, Pennsylvanians, New Yorkers, and New Englanders are no more. I am not a Virginian but an American.” It is this spirit that it is needed today, not the toxic cocktail of identity politics.

To support 71 Republic, please donate to our Patreon, which you can find here.

Featured Image Source