Tag: LNC

Austin Petersen Should Run For Chair of The Libertarian Party

By Spencer Kellogg | @TheNewTreasury

The Libertarian Party is at it again. In a bitter tweet teeming with contempt, the Libertarian Party attacked former presidential candidate Austin Petersen over his third-place finish in the recent Missouri Senate GOP primary. Suggesting the outsider campaign received a ‘thorough drubbing’, the Libertarian Party attacked Petersen in a predictable, garish fashion that situates party over principle.

Make no mistake – the LP has had it out for Petersen ever since the Missourian had the gall to go against the grain in 2016 with his firebrand candidacy for President. Staking out against pragmatist and power broker favorite Gary Johnson, Petersen brought an inspired, youthful spin on what has become a water-logged party pushing a message of post-libertarian pragmatist philosophy.  The most recent outburst from party officials signals exactly where they stand: they would rather get their asses kicked every election with ‘their guys’ than cede any small semblance of provisional power they have extorted from true-blue libertarians that have been rooted out or left the party, year after year, in protest.

This isn’t about libertarianism. If it were, Austin Petersen would already have his membership back and we would all be celebrating his return. So aggrieved are they that Petersen dared to run as a Republican, the Libertarian Party refuses to do the right thing and extend an olive branch to one of the few people that has time and time again stuck by libertarian values even if it meant a slower climb up the political ladder.

This is the same maddening practice that the LP resorted to regarding Ron Paul. Paul, who used his Republican Congressional seat to inspire and educated the masses on what it means to be a libertarian, is persona non grata amongst the leadership in the LP. While Mr. Paul gave an intimate speech to the LP Mises Caucus the night before the 2018 convention, the LNC had spent months parroting claims that Paul had no idea what libertarianism meant. It would all be a great joke if the balance of the country wasn’t at stake.

Petersen’s principles have never been questioned. Sure, he has had his run-ins (most notably with his suggestion that we might take another look at the NAP) but over and over again Petersen has espoused a small government, minarchist position when given the opportunity. Running for federal office as a Republican, Petersen accomplished more for the libertarian movement and principles than arguably any other campaign in the past decade. No, this bickering is simply about party politics. That same gross malady of back scratching and power positioning that turned so many of us against the two-party duopoly is apparently alive and well in the current Libertarian Party.

Austin Petersen has always had his enemies. Some have been made through his own doing but many more have simply been the type of jealous, snide simpletons that often anchor themselves to fringe political movements. Make no mistake, the Libertarian Party is a fringe one. There, the funds will always be thinner and the votes fewer at the ballot box. Until we break out from the zombie-like lull of ill-suited pragmatists and the never-surrender wing of economic fundamentalists, the Libertarian Party will remain an afterthought. Petersen, more than any other libertarian, sits in a unique position to mend the wounds of the disaffected caucuses while bringing new people, from every walk of life, into the movement and party.

While some have resorted to pot shots at Petersen for his 8.3% performance in the Missouri GOP Senate Primary last week, any libertarian worth their salt recognizes just how impressive he actually was. In Missouri, Petersen ran a grassroots, anti-war, all-your-guns, pro-Bitcoin, from an open heart of liberty campaign and he performed with class and substance. He made countless media appearances on some of the biggest networks in this country and spoke eloquently from a classically liberal point of view.

As he emphasized small government, a smart, well-oiled Libertarian Party would see the benefits of this performance. They would put feelers out to see if AP would consider rejoining the party and perhaps even suggest he run for a position of power within the structure. Instead, they have done nothing but attack, deride, and immolate any chance at a reconciliation. Case and point: current chair of the Libertarian Party Nicholas Sarwark.

Screen Shot 2018-08-14 at 2.32.35 PM

This facebook post is indicative of the type of authoritarian hierarchical traits that Sarwark displays at every opportunity. While his doomed Pheonix Mayor campaign has yielded absolutely no mainstream media attention whatsoever, Sarwark is happy to post crass, juvenile messages from the comfort of his bully pit. As the youngest presidential candidate on the stage in 2016, Petersen rallied the disaffected membership and almost sank the tired ship of cat herders that goes by the title LNC. This message, posted only two days after Petersen’s loss is the perfect example of Sarwark’s consistently snarky tone and dismissive attitude towards Petersen.

When was the last time you can recall Nicholas Sarwark, the current chair of the Libertarian Party, involved in any meaningful media push? You can’t, because he never has. While some have chosen to lampoon Petersen’s third-place performance in Missouri last week, I doubt we will hear the same people trash talking the campaign of Sarwark for Phoenix Mayor. He will finish a distant last, without any major media representation and chalk it up to just working outside the two-party duopoly. Meanwhile, Petersen featured prominently on Fox News throughout the campaign while giving headlining speeches at YAL summit and Politicon.

Instead of reaching his hand with a welcome gesture, Sarwark shot a spiked torpedo at Petersen and his many thousands of fans across the country. Recruit someone better? Let me give you a little reality check Mr. Chair – there is no one better. Since Ron Paul, there hasn’t been one serious Libertarian candidate who possessed the intellect, organization, and unbreakable spirit of Petersen. If you believe Gary Johnson lit the world on fire in 2016 then I’ve got a bridge to sell to you. Never forget, these are the same folks who are gleefully suggesting we run gun control advocate Bill Weld as the presidential candidate in 2020.

Petersen, on the other hand, has been spearheaded a political philosophy that seeks to expand gun rights instead of restricting them. While Weld calls certain guns ‘weapons of mass destruction,’ Petersen made headlines around the country for auctioning off AR-15 rifles and 3-D printing machines. You know… like a real libertarian should do.

Petersen’s 54,810 votes and over $500,000 raised are a testament to his messaging strength and impressive fundraising abilities. More than any single person in the Libertarian movement, AP seems apt and positioned to perform at a new level of political size and philosophical scope for a movement and party that are yearning to discuss the real truth of the American situation. Petersen possesses the passion, diction, star power, and organization necessary to lead the Libertarian Party to where it’s going. Where is the Libertarian Party going? With Petersen at the helm, it’s going to win and change this country forever.

Ideologically, Petersen puts a fresh spin on the tried and true, bread and butter of the Libertarian Party: The Fed. It’s all about the Federal Reserve. It is through the Federal Reserve that the wars are financed and it is through the Federal Reserve that our dollar has been inflated and devalued through the long, finite arm of the unrepentant state. Throughout his campaign, Petersen was forward thinking in his adoption and advocacy for Bitcoin. He repeatedly broke the record for Bitcoin donations and brought a reliable intellect to the political discussion about the nascent economic space. This emphasis on a counter-economy that is voluntary and independently sovereign speaks to the core of what Austin Petersen represents as a candidate: freedom.

When was the last time you genuinely heard the Libertarian Party say anything remotely relevant or interesting about crypto? The answer is never. I saw it on the ground in New Orleans at this year’s convention. The low levels of knowledge and interest in the blockchain community were startling. Outside a small wave of newcomers who found libertarianism through crypto, the power people in the party seem in no real rush to capitalize on a movement that is definitively anti-fed and anti-war. While the Libertarian Party speaks in bated breath about the massive independent vote waiting to be won throughout the country, they seem terribly incapable of reaching out to one of the largest and most ideologically libertarian subsects of contemporary society: cryptocurrency.

In the age of Trump, it would be false to assume that flash does not matter. In many ways, the political process in America has turned into a game show of unabashed braggadocio. Electing Petersen chair of the Libertarian Party would give the party the sort of immediate media push that is desperately needed to propel our numbers, base, and opportunities to win throughout the country.

Many inside the party point out the fact that the 60% of independent voters that don’t vote in our current electoral system are a target for the LP but as it stands, they aren’t even hearing us. Right now, if we have a great candidate or new platform addition that we want to promote, a beleaguered email in gaudy type font goes out to the membership and dies in the laps of LP activists across the country. Sarwark possesses no great microphone to reach the disenfranchised masses. Petersen has shown, consistently, that he attracts the media in a way that the LP arguably has never been able to.

If I seem frustrated, it’s because I am. I sat idly by at this year’s convention and bowed before the altar of moderate pragmatism. Although I didn’t vote for Mr. Sarwark, I accepted it with the usual ‘next time’ sentiment and packed my bags for the East Coast. I was every part of that glazed over membership who, for one weekend, forgot the insipidness and hardened maliciousness of Sarwark and company. The recent outbursts on social media have reconfigured my lens. I hope Petersen considers running. With the Mises Caucus hopefully at his back, Petersen could take the Libertarian Party in a bold direction that harkens back to the principles that founded the movement and party. If nothing else, it would be a hell of a race.

To support 71 Republic, please donate to our Patreon, which you can find here.

Featured Image Source


Libertarian Vice Chair Arvin Vohra Blunders With Rapist Comment

Spencer Kellogg | United States

Arvin Vohra has officially gone off the deep end with his latest comments. Today he posted a nearly incoherent rant on his Facebook page that began with “Listen, guys, rapists are good people who sometimes do things we may individually disagree with,” This brand of off-beat messaging is unbecoming of the leadership of any political party and the statement is particularly tone-deaf given today’s climate.

In the post, a rant teeming with cynicism, Vohra attempts to make a strange analogy that, of course, ends with the promotion of school choice (because Vohra’s major concern seems to always be teenagers). He begins by praising rapists, calling them ‘good people’ and suggests that ‘if we treat rapists negatively, it may cause them not to vote libertarian.’ His countless missteps have been documented throughout the past year. Here, Vohra attempts to dig out some meaning with an awfully timed joke and just ends up misstepping again.

His shock and awe technique regresses the work of decent libertarians and alienates those who are considering taking us seriously. It would appear that the parliamentary vote to wave a philosophical finger at Vohra during last month’s LNC meeting wasn’t enough to calm the antics of the most incessant man in the Libertarian Party.

Read the full post here: Vohra Facebook Statement

Vohra ends the message where it should have begun with a concentrated pitch against war and government schooling. Even here though, Vohra is abrasive in his insinuation that government schools are “morally wrong.” While many libertarians take issue with what they see as an indoctrination process from the centralized centers of public education, the suggestion that it is ‘morally wrong’ only stands to turn off prospective voters from the message of libertarianism without address the very real concerns of parents across the nation.

The Vice Chair’s election competition was quick to take advantage of the gaffe. Joe Paschal and Alex Merced linked images to their own campaigns for VC on the post in question. Users on Vohra’s page were in almost complete unison in their anger and frustration with the VC. Here are just a few of the comments on the post:

Photo From TEDxGlenEcho 50 on Flicker

Inside The 2018 New Mexico Libertarian Convention

Spencer Kellogg | Albuquerque NM

The Libertarian Party of New Mexico held their annual convention in downtown Albuquerque on Saturday afternoon. An impressive group of almost 20 candidates accepted nominations and unified behind a campaign of fighting corruption throughout the state.

Headlining the convention was New Mexico Land Commissioner Aubrey Dunn who last week filed to run for US Senate against Democrat incumbent Martin Heinrich. Dunn, a former bank president and cattle rancher auctioned off two pieces of gold while admonishing the Federal Reserve’s monetary policy.


Mr. Dunn railed against the FISA court and pointed to his experience in banking as proof of government overreach:

“I was a banker for 25 years. I saw first hand what the government did to the banking system. Every check you wrote they had access to it. And they still do today. It’s even worse. Any transaction over three thousand dollars is tracked to know where it came from.

State Chair Chris Luchini proudly announced surging membership numbers that have risen from 5,200 to 7,600 in the past year alone. Across New Mexico, the Libertarian Party will run 3 federal campaigns, 3 state wide and 14 local campaigns that include races for Sheriff, Magistrate and City Council. Luchini also informed members that a $100,000 dollar donation has been left to the party after a recent death.

A. Blair Dunn

Aubrey Dunn’s son, Blair, commanded the room during an impactful speech that lobbied against the unconstitutional practices of current Attorney General Hector Balderas. Blair was instrumental in his father’s upset bid for Land Commissioner and is seen as a rising legal star in the state. His candidacy for Attorney General represents one of the strongest on the ticket.

Entrepreneur & consultant Lloyd Princeton, candidate for the New Mexico District 1 Congressional race, was on hand for the afternoon festivities. Princeton’s campaign is amongst the best organized and well funded in the state and he spoke on the foundation of liberty as a principle of personal responsibility. Later, he won a gold bill during Mr. Dunn’s auction.

Lloyd Princeton

Military veteran Chris Manning, a candidate for US Representative of District 3, spoke passionately about the lagging school system of New Mexico suggesting they could be better.

Chris Manning

Former democratic state legislator Sandra Jeff is running for Secretary of State and gives the ticket what it notably lacks – legislative experience. Her time in the New Mexico state legislature was remembered for Jeff’s falling out with the Democrat Party when she refused to vote and play by party lines.

Sandra Jeff

Other notable business included a vote for delegates to represent New Mexico at the 2018 Libertarian National Convention in New Orleans. In an impressive turnout that signaled the momentum of the state party, double the amount of open delegate spots were contested for. In comparison, many states have trouble filling their delegate roll especially for an off-year convention.

Tom Mahon

Tom Mahon, senior aide to Gary Johnson’s 2016 campaign, was the last delegate to speak. His high-powered voice boomed across the room and an energized crowd celebrated his surprise announcement to run for the Libertarian National Committee this summer.

The 2018 New Mexico State Libertarian Convention will be remembered for its energetic and supportive spirit. Here, in the high desert, a group of anti corruption, pro freedom candidates appeared in solidarity behind a message of liberty. Taking advantage of their newly acquired major party status in New Mexico, the party is running a strong group of contenders for state and federal office.

Oh and did I mention there were rocket launchers?

2018: Making The Libertarian Party Great Again

By Austin Anderholt | United States

The libertarian party is often looked at as a joke. It makes a mistake and people laugh. “Haha! This is why the libertarian party will never work!” While they are obviously held to much higher standards than the two main parties, I do admit they make their fair share of large mistakes. At times they can make the future of the party look quite grim, but these mistakes will actually propel the party to new heights, even landing it the title of “major political party” (if we’re lucky). Here’s why:

Let’s take the case of Arvin Vohra. Mr. Vohra, vice chair of the Libertarian Party, recently came under fire for comments that many deemed “pro-pedophilia.” Many two party spectators saw this event as just another reason why the libertarian party will never grow but this was something very different. A huge amount of libertarians took to social media and other mediums to contact their local LNC representative to vote to remove Vohra from office. The libertarians were furious! When, days ago, the LNC failed to meet the two thirds majority vote to fire Vohra, libertarians became ever more disgusted!

Another example is Ron Paul not being allowed to speak at the 2018 LNC convention. Almost every libertarian is angry at the backstabbing that their party’s leadership has given them. They are sick of trying to defend these irrational decisions. They are sick of being “the joke party.”

What does this mean? The party absolutely despises the leaders that continue to do this to them! When these leaders run for re-election, they are going to be ripped limb-by-limb. The terrible guidance of the party has resulted in a huge amount of 2018 candidates vowing to “drain the libertarian swamp” and they are not going down without a fight. 2018 will be remembered in the libertarian party. 2018 will be the year that the LP started to become a major party. Mark my words.

Sarwark Vs. Smith, To Debate Or Not To Debate?

By Ryan Lau | United States

In a new development Sunday, tensions are rising between candidates for the Chairmanship of the Libertarian Party. This July, incumbent Nicholas Sarwark will attempt to defend his seat against Think Liberty founder Joshua Smith. The election will take place at the Libertarian National Convention in New Orleans.

Before the election, Smith hopes that he may be able to debate Sarwark on a number of policy differences. 71 Republic may sponsor this debate. So far, the only slated meeting of the two candidates will take place at a forum in Long Beach, California. Additionally, a debate at the Nebraska Libertarian Party State Convention was planned, but then canceled.

However, it is still possible that a debate between the two may not occur. Despite Smith’s firm advocacy for one to occur, Sarwark has yet to confirm his availability. In the following video obtained from an anonymous source, Smith asked Sarwark to increase the number of debates beyond one. Sarwark replied calmly, stating that “I’ll have to see about scheduling”.

Without a doubt, the ultimate victor of this race may have a huge impact on the future direction of the party. In the above video, Sarwark and 2020 Presidential Candidate Adam Kokesh agreed on the importance of the party’s future. After Kokesh stated he has “a lot of interest in the future of the party”, Sarwark agreed, remarking “that’s good, we all do”.

However, it is possible that voters may not be able to see a debate between the two candidates prior to their critical election if the two cannot reach an agreement on a time and place for such a debate to occur. What are your opinions on the subject? Please add your comments below.