Tag: private schools

We Need a Revolution in American Education

By Jack Parkos | United States

“School days, I believe, are the unhappiest in the whole span of human existence. They are full of dull, unintelligible tasks, new and unpleasant ordinances, brutal violations of common sense and common decency. It doesn’t take a reasonably bright boy long to discover that most of what is rammed into him is nonsense, and that no one really cares very much whether he learns it or not.”   -H.L. Mencken

The American school system has failed children. Education itself is beautiful, but in practice, the agendas of educators often influence it. This plague occurs in both public and private schools. Too often, the subject is pointless, the education model is cruel, and many students end up miserable.

There is a common false assumption that if one criticizes the modern state of education, he or she is “anti-education”. On the contrary, it is the modern state of education that indeed runs against learning.

The American Education Model

If one were to observe a factory of the industrial revolution, the following things would likely occur:

  1. Individuals show up at a designated time and place.
  2. They all sit in rows where they do similar work.
  3. They must obey the commands of those in charge.
  4. These workers do not make their own innovations, but rather all stick to one plan.
  5. They all receive a small break for lunch.
  6. The outcome of their work is graded receives a very general, often-misleading grade.

Is this not how a classroom works? Students show up, sit in their assigned desks, and obey orders. Seldom do they get to think outside the box. Especially in earlier education, it is most common for every student in the school to do the same tasks and assignments as if they were all the same. Preaching diversity, American schools are soon to forget that there is intellectual diversity as well. Giving letter grades that reveal little about the student, teachers grade our children like meats in a market.

An Eerie Intention

These similarities are not an accident. The American education model is based on the “Prussian Model”, which 19th century Prussia used. Under this system, the State took control of education away from parents and churches. Of course, they did not use it to breed intelligent, free-thinking individuals. Instead, it created obedient industrial workers and soldiers; in fact, Napoleon used this very system to train his soldiers.

This system is cruel, outdated, and does not cater to the needs of the student. Education should create thinkers, not doers. The government promised the people free public schooling and the trap was set, whether intentional or not. They essentially own children in their time of prime influence. Though parents are free to teach their children what they choose in addition, they cannot opt out of certain governmental standards.

Common Core and Standards

Without a doubt, Common Core is a god that failed. Supposedly, it was to give each student an equal opportunity at success. It did this by creating government standards and a curriculum that it held each student to. Perhaps, one may think this curriculum must hold some value in order for experts to require it. Yet, federal education officials, rather than teachers themselves, were the primary creators. Teachers’ roles were, on the contrary, quite low, with only two unions invited to bring representatives to discuss Common Core.

This system is flawed for many reasons. First off, no two human brains are the same, and nobody thinks exactly the same. It is simply foolish to think every child in America must learn the same curriculum at the same pace. Albert Einstein said the following:

Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.

Is this not how schooling goes, making fish climb trees? Where the monkey may prevail, the goldfish sits behind a failure. When the fish cannot show off its swimming skills, it cannot thrive. In schools, teachers may judge musical geniuses by their ability to interpret poetry. When they do not perform well, they receive less-than-adequate class placement and struggle to move forward in class and life.

Common Core has even leaked into private schools as well, many of whom still run the curriculum. This system has kept parents out of their kids’ education. It has turned educational beauty into standardized test prep. Teachers and administrators, too, are victims in this sense, as they lose the freedom to select a curriculum.

Content in Education

Currently, much of the content in schools merely is preparing for standardized testing, and the tests themselves are a harm to students and schools alike. It is not to prepare students for the real world and give them the skills they need to achieve. Many students look at their math homework and wonder, “When will I ever use this in life?” In truth, often times they may only do so for the SAT’s and ACT’s. These can determine what college you go to, and thus your future. But why are these particular skills on two tests for the entire country? Why must complicated formulas with no real world application determine someone’s future? Unfortunately, these questions often have no answer.

Classes about managing money, the economy, law, government, raising a family, and other useful topics are often optional. On the contrary, more obscure subjects like chemistry, geometry, and physics are not. Subjects that students will often only use on a test get priority over subjects everyone will deal with in life. Students receive little personal finance education, but can sure write a geometry proof.

This is not the fault of the teachers, many truly want to make a difference in the life of a child. This is the fault of legislators in D.C. mudding the water with bureaucracy.

Necessary Reform

Major reform is essential for a turnaround of the education system. Indoctrination should not replace learning. Students who want to be lawyers should be able to pursue law, rather than polynomials. As standardized testing becomes the norm, and international test scores nonetheless fall, we face a clear shortcoming.

Ultimately, it is essential to give more educational choice to parents and, in later ages, children themselves. They must be able to pursue their dreams in a more individualized environment. The government has failed to do so. Perhaps, this is no surprise, given their track record on other blatant domestic and foreign blunders. Parents, should those who know little about your children really be in charge of their learning?


71 Republic is the Third Voice in media. We pride ourselves on distinctively independent journalism and editorials. Every dollar you give helps us grow our mission of providing reliable coverage. Please consider donating to our Patreon, which you can find here.

Featured Image Source

Advertisements

How Education Could Work in a Libertarian Culture

By Manuel Martin | United States

Politicians and the government currently have a monopoly on education. This allows them to change the past, control the present, and design the future. We are failing our youth by giving politicians (of all people) a monopoly on our children’s evolving minds. To submit the youth to political education is to ignore the reality that politicians have zero interest in teaching a social values system based on human respect and peaceful persuasion. Rather, the basis of their influence is founded upon controlling citizens through the social values of coercion reinforced with gun violence. After all, politicians ultimately reinforce all directives with violence. Education, without a doubt, works no differently.

If there was ever a sector of the economy that should be subject to the customer satisfaction free enterprise system (and liberated from political coercion), it’s education. Our youth deserve teachers, administrators, and business professionals focused on customer satisfaction instead of bureaucrats following political directives.

Libertarians want to end the government’s involvement in education. First and foremost, this is because our youth deserve better than teachers giving them (even if subliminally) a social values system of coercion over persuasion and collectivism over individual human respect.

Freedom of Education

Educational freedom will liberate entrepreneurs from political restrictions. This will indubitably result in a diversity of educational options. Moreover, parents will be free to choose a school that fits their child’s personality.

If your child is rowdy, bursting with energy and loves to play, there will be a school for your child. The school may offer two or three hours of recess, or other activities to suit your child’s needs. Is your child a baseball or soccer protégé? Well, there may also evolve schools designed to cultivate your child’s athletic potential. If your child is inclined to entrepreneurship, there may evolve schools designed to help your child become a business tycoon. If your child has artistic inclinations, schools will evolve to help your child become a professional artist. Freedom in education will give parents the ability to shop for a school tailored to their child’s personality, instead of shopping by zip code.

The great paradox in our current educational system is that politicians believe their educational mandates promote fairness. However, there is nothing fair about forcing youth into a one-size-fits-all monopolistic system. In fact, this system which promotes inequality, as the students who do well in the government method will outperform other students who may perform well using other methods. Students who aren’t receptive to the sit down for 7 hours and listen to a lecturer method have no choice but to underperform. After all, the government forces them into this system that does not cater to their personality.

Multiple Learning Methods

Let’s assume there are five different learning methods teachers can use to teach children. In reality, there are infinitely many more. Regardless, America’s “Prussian lecture system” is just one, but students who may do well with other method are often labeled as dumb, lazy, ADHD, or other insults by the system. These same children may excel in an interactive, seminar-based, or outdoor system, instead.

Our young are caged into a one-size-fits-all system where they are denied the opportunity to learn according to their personality. How receptive to learning would you be if your instruction did not align with your learning style?

What if politicians regulated the automobile industry in the same way they standardize education? They could, for example, mandate that companies can only sell vehicles with two doors and a four-cylinder engine. Would you be okay with this limitation on your freedom to choose products that entrepreneurs made to meet your needs? I’m guessing not, as you may want the option of a V6, V8, SUV, four doors, or perhaps a truck. Most recognize the benefits of competition for their automobile needs, yet most don’t make the connection that students are being denied the benefit of market competition.

Politicians are stripping entrepreneurs of the ability to provide parents the freedom to choose an educational model that suits their child’s personality. This is a disgrace that history will look back on as barbaric.

Ending government’s involvement in education will not only free parents and children from monopoly control, but also free young adults wishing to start their professional careers.

Career Jumpstarts

Want to be a lawyer? Have you ever asked yourself why can’t you just start law school at 14, 15 or 16 years old? Or, why do you have to go to law school in the first place? Why do you have to pass a coercively mandated state bar exam? Why can’t you just study law, start a law practice, and allow your customer results to publically prove your industry knowledge?  Your customer results, not a government certificate, are proof of the value which you generate for others.

Want to be a chiropractor? Political mandates dictate that you must sacrifice four years of your life earning a bachelor’s degree before you are “free” to learn from doctors wishing to teach you chiropractic medicine. Think about that for a second; we live in a time when a group of individuals is forcing those who wish to learn medicine (and help others), to sacrifice four years of their life earning an unnecessary degree. Are those your values? Do you honestly believe one person should have the ability to control four years of another?

Libertarianism is true compassion, compassion to give people human respect to design their own lives.  In a libertarian culture, you could apprentice under your local chiropractor for a year or two. Once the local chiropractor thinks you’re ready to go on your own, he will certify your abilities. In his community, his reputation will be enough to certify your abilities and gain you customers. If you try to go outside his local community, then his certification may not carry much weight. As a result, you may need to go to a traditional chiropractic school. Or, you may have to develop a positive reputation and customer reviews through regulating channels (like Yelp), which allow you to move outside his community.

Traditional Chiropractic schools will, of course, still exist. But, there is no reason to think it would take ten years to become proficient in chiropractic medicine (or regular medicine). The curriculum may take two, three, or four years.

A World of Possibility

The vibrancy of free markets will lead to an unlimited amount of educational models meeting the varying needs of educational consumers. True progress is lifting political chains and freeing people to meet the educational needs of our next generation. Progress is not forcing individuals into a uniform system denying entrepreneurs the freedom to teach according to a student’s dynamic personality.  Our youth and young professionals deserve the human respect to be free of the educational monopoly.

Here is a plan that can act as a blueprint for how to dismantle the governmental educational complex. An assumption here is that we have evolved our culture to the progressive libertarian ethical standard and are working to efficiently and virtuously dismantle federal and state governments. Moreover, I assume that first, society has eliminated the income tax and replaced it with a sales tax. Lastly, I assume that educational spending does not have a sales tax on it.

The Libertarian Educational Plan

Step One: Eliminate compulsory education laws. If a young adult feels they would rather spend their time working than sitting in class, they should have the human respect to make that decision.

Step Two: Eliminate all federal and state laws and regulations that limit the creation of new schools. Entrepreneurs should be free to build as many schools as they need to meet market demands.

Step Three: Eliminate curriculum standards. How much English, math, Spanish, or geometry is necessary should be up to parents, entrepreneurs, and market competition to decide. The State should have no say in the matter.

Step Four: Transition all federal government spending on education to a voucher system. Parents, in this system, choose the school, and the school cashes the voucher. Vouchers will be in place for two years, after which they go away and schools will (like every other private sector business) stay afloat by attracting voluntarily paying customers.

Step Five: Eliminate all mandates on professional certifications. To clarify, colleges that teach professions such as law, medicine, and engineering will still exist. Without a doubt, there is clear market demand. On the other hand, we are simply getting rid of government involvement. For example, if someone is 17 years of age wanting to study medicine and there is a medical school willing to teach him, he can go to that school, regardless if he has a bachelor’s degree or not. Schools will be free to design the length of their curriculum. Does med school really need to be ten years in length, or can one complete it in five? Who knows? After all, there isn’t a free market competing to meet the needs of educational customers.

Also, aspiring professionals can apprentice under other professionals, either to gain experience and increase one’s chances of getting into professional schools or to start their own profession.

These reforms will result is an educational system that meets the needs of all educational consumers for all income levels. With the market free to build schools, the income tax eliminated, colleges free to educate as they see fit and with the two-year voucher system directing money to the schools which are most efficient, the market will be ready to meet the needs of educational consumers without political influence.


Get awesome merch. Help 71 Republic end the media oligarchy. Donate today to our Patreon, which you can find here. Thank you very much for your support!

Featured Image Source