Ruining ‘Adam Ruins Guns’

By Thomas DiGennaro | United States

On November 27th, 2018, season two of TruTV’s comedy series “Adam Ruins Everything” aired. This episode resonated with many on the all-too-familiar topic of guns. For those who aren’t familiar with the show, host Adam Conover explains and debunks myths and untruths that almost everyone believes. This episode, Adam Ruins Guns, portrays an argument between a gun-toting, NRA card carrying, elderly father and his young daughter who advocates for ‘common sense’ gun laws.

Like any other episode of the series, Conover shows up to debunk both sides’ opinions and “tell neither of them what they want to hear”. This article aims to explain the correct arguments Conover made debunking myths about guns and gun control, but also to include glaringly left-out arguments, as well as one specific myth.

Adam’s Argument

Adam Conover embarks on a relentless journey to highlight the ineffectiveness of many of the proposed solutions to gun violence and the myths about America’s gun violence issues. A few, for example, would be that ‘common sense’ gun laws and ‘assault’ weapon bans would deter gun violence. The rebuttal to this myth is that A) very rarely is a brand new, just-purchased firearm used in a crime and B) also very rarely are AR-15s, and other rifles of a similar style, used in crimes; it’s almost always handguns.

So if that doesn’t work, what’s next? Do we ban the sale of any type of firearm? Well, Conover has a response for that one too. It is the undeniable fact that there are over 300 million legally owned firearms in the United States. Even if nobody manufactures or sells a gun again, there are about as many guns in the country as people. So, continuing down the slope of how extreme of a measure of gun control could work, the daughter resorts to a favorite criticism by the left of America and guns: Australia.

In 1996, Australia, in wake of several mass shootings, passed the National Firearms Agreement requiring a license to possess a firearm. Citizens cannot obtain the license without showing a “genuine reason” for ownership. However, the law does not consider self-defense a “genuine reason” to own a firearm. The argument against self-defense aside, the practice in Australia would be to no avail in the United States; there are simply too many guns in circulation.

Thus, the question is: how did Australia eradicate the country of guns prior to the NFA? They conducted a mandatory, nationwide buy-back of all guns in circulation at full market value. But the tremendous cost of buying back the guns Australia’s population of 24 million owns pales to that of the United States. The USA has 325 million people and 300 million-plus guns. Plus, the Australian buyback was not effective in reducing crime, anyways.

Clearly, there doesn’t seem to be an effective measure of gun control that is currently being proposed by the left. Keep in mind, this rebuttal to gun control measures is entirely independent of any argument about the negative effects of gun control. Just one of those is the classic conservative argument, but with a little more depth; the idea that if you take away legally owned guns, only criminals will have them. Simply put, there will always be a black market. Anytime something is outlawed, banned, or prohibited, the only thing that occurs is the diminishing of legal means of purchase, possession, and ownership. We as a country had a firsthand experience with the exact practice in the early 20th century with the prohibition of alcohol, and again in the past few decades with narcotics.

The Framers’ Intent

Conover doesn’t support anyone’s stance, he just argues with everyone. The foundation of his argument is the widespread myth today that the intention of the framers, a common argument for guns, was the individual’s right to personal self-defense. Obviously no one cannot be 100% certain to precisely what the hell a bunch of guys in powdered wings with wooden teeth meant over 200 years ago. However, the argument Conover cites is nothing but an assumption based on a whim; the right to bear arms is not intended in the context of personal self-defense, but rather for the capability of citizens to form militias when the bell rings.

A little history lesson: the founding fathers did not believe in a standing army. In times of war, invasion, men would be called to the militia, and they would show up toting their Kentucky Long Rifles. It is often forgotten that the reason the founders believed that this right was inalienable and could not be infringed was the idea that the very force that the militia would be called to fight was their own tyrannical government. So in order to ensure that the government could not prevent the militia from being able to assemble and revolt, the Second Amendment reads “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” The statement is rather complex and seems difficult to even understand what it means. An easier to understand structurally and grammatically worded phrase that encaptures the same meaning is, the right of citizens to have access to firearms is necessary for the citizens to form the militias, which is necessary for the safety and security of the nation, and it shall not be infringed.

The NRA

Throughout the portion of the episode where Conover is arguing against the intent of the framers’ argument, he discusses how the NRA, when originally formed, was not an advocate of gun rights. Rather it was an organization with the agenda to make the armed citizens of the country better marksmen after “embarrassing shooting” during the Civil War. Furthermore, he explains how the Supreme Court refused to rule on the issue of the Second Amendment until more recent times. This happened when the NRA adopted the position of gun rights and through growing power and lobbying, spread the belief that the Second Amendment was drafted with the intention of the individual right to personal self-defense.

As a brief disclaimer, the NRA is a bunch of corporate suits and lobbyists who are only concerned with lining their pockets. The Gun Owner’s of America organization is a truly principled gun rights advocacy group that has received support from Ron Paul and other leaders in the liberty movement. 

Regardless of whether or not the Second Amendment was intended for the right of self-defense, is not only a libertarian principle but one that is primarily the basis of the non-aggression principle and the idea of negative rights. (The right not to be killed, not the right to live).

Militias

Moreover, as Conover and UCLA Constitutional Law Professor Adam Winkler–who was invited on the show to provide expertise on the subject–stated: the Second Amendment, with original intention, can most concisely be laid out as an individual right to be armed so that the militia can be called upon. I do not dispute this. However, the myth I hope to disprove, that has become widespread since Justice Scalia’s ruling on D.C. vs Heller, is the notion that the ‘first portion’ of the second amendment, the militia, is obsolete today. 

The militia was vital in the 18th and 19th century because the founders did not believe in a standing army, so the militia was our national defense. But it is still vital today for two reasons. The first is that a citizenry most certainly must be able to defend themselves from an oppressor, including their own government. The United States Armed Forces and all of its branches are under the control of the United States government. In a case where people must defend themselves from grave injustices committed by their own government–in the words of George Washington– “A free people ought not only to be armed, but disciplined”. A well-regulated militia still is necessary to the security of a free state, to use the exact language from the Second Amendment.  

The second reason for the essential nature of an armed citizenry forming a militia coincides with its universally agreed upon intention, to defend the nation from foreign attack. If the United States must commit a vast majority of its forces overseas to fight a major war, who will defend the home soil? Sure they can call the reserves and we have our weekend warrior national guardsmen, but the vast majority of our defense will be armed everyday men. Police, truck drivers, factory workers, businessmen will have to take up arms for a common defense, the same way in 1776 farmers and blacksmiths held the line against tyranny from an imperialistic British Empire. I will support that claim.

Adam is Ruined

Adam Conover is not an expert on guns. And his ruining of the mainstream opinions surrounding guns is a fundamentally flawed endeavor. He fails to grasp the empirical results of gun control and has little understanding of the intentions of the founding fathers.

As Isoroku Yamamoto, Commander-in-Chief of the Imperial Japanese Navy during World War II said:

“You cannot invade the mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind every blade of grass”.


71 Republic is the Third Voice in media. We pride ourselves on distinctively independent journalism and editorials. Every dollar you give helps us grow our mission of providing reliable coverage. Please consider donating to our Patreon, which you can find here. Thank you very much for your support!

Featured Image Source

5 thoughts on “Ruining ‘Adam Ruins Guns’”

  1. vancouver Asian Dating Website

    vancouver asian dating

    Our Vancouver asian dating site offers free members for people seeking online love, neighbours, Casual dating or just new people for companionship. the actual Asians are nerds and weak. Anyway interracial dating looks like it’s a big failure in a white majority society. What exactly trying to find? If an Indian or Asian male wants to obtain me with hatred for being seen with an asian or Indian girl, understand that, It goes for both. Take a understand this video: Here a indian actress been kissed on the cheek by a white man rich Gere, Which led India wide demonstration. Signing up to our service is a quick always easy, And once complete you’ll be ready to sending messages to ladies right away. If it is just sex you want do not bother.

    A highly intellectual achievement and an intellectually challenging task worth mentioning and those who do have strong academic profile, Many end up pursuing business, marketing and advertising tactics, economic. I never say that Vivian Luk presents all Asian women. mind, Or sensitivity, not necessarily crimes. these would be averagely, Intellectually really difficult discourses. After all almost all Canadians are from some other part of the world. Asian seeing: Some cultural caveats One thing that many Asian cultures have in common is the value of family and honour.

    Meet Vancouver california Asian dating

    Vancouver is a worthwhile, beneficial, Multi societal city, With a ton of adventures. las vegas dui attorney that 6 pack, You turn eyeballs, full stop. magic hair, organic eyes, Heavyset overall body. Asian dating in Canada Canada enjoys the single most multicultural societies on the planet, With recent projections showing that almost 30% of the citizenry will be foreign born by 2031. This dating site has a residential district of over 2 million singles from China, the japanese, Thailand your Philippines, Plus other asian countries. need Asian singles in Canada? and / or, Is this just the dilemma of the mid 20 somethings? might also signup to get your matches delivered to you via e mail. you can, For those seeking to meet Asian singles, EliteSingles Canada is the perfect place to email potential partners.

    Meet Vancouver arizona Asian dating

    It truly could not be more readily found love on InterracialDatingCentral sign up, Create a profile and look at the thousands of singles we have on our global database. to start with, I can not believe the type of racism that still exists here in Vancouver. As i don’t know if you have indeed visited Japan or interacted with Japanese people. Asians come to North America to get away from the slums, The file corruption, The class issues in their house country. EliteSingles will benefit you write an engaging online dating profile, Offer tips on taking your profile picture and make good tips about how to keep your profile current and southern chinese women engaging.

    First of let me say that i am an Asian male who is happily dating an Asian Female, And i favor Asian females. So play it by ear be open to cultural variation, But also aware of the fact that everyone has a unique set of values and expectations for Asian dating. And to those Asian girls that hate on us Asian guys. n entrepreneur, Businesmann, Accoutnant, Accoutnant, eatery owner, kitchen owner, property mogul, Real estae mogu. filtration Groups Most events get posted there. so santa, Unfortuantely, Did not choose a knowledgeable, processed Asian woman. Another model is Cradle 2 the grave movie.

    Asian dating vancouver canada reizen, Dating meet household

    Sure an asian women may make alot of money, But she’ll have tiny breasts, that can bore the hell out of you I like my women like I like my life wild and full of endless humor. From what i have seen, Many Asian girls end up getting hurt by white boyfriends. I wonder if these problems still hold today? For singles in vancouver, Online dating is super way to meet new people. Douglas, It is what you didn’t write that is angering so many. Luk, Being truely Vancouver born if she have been to the Vancouver Sun Run or participate in game around the town. In its effort to locate members sticking with the same search criteria EliteSingles updates their matchmaking algorithm continuously, Making sure members find the most recent and compatible results based on relationship preferences, establishment, And figure test answers. Your kind is a death breed, thankfully.

    Asian dating vancouver canada reizen, Dating meet your home and family

    Two: They worry that white men appreciate Asian women. you might have no freaking culture, And a lot of you appear to zombies. I like to meet someone thats can complement me. In Metro calgary, Which has the highest rate of mixed race human relationships in Canada nine per cent, Lee said he has been in three serious partners two with Chinese women and one with a Caucasian. For all of you Indian and Chinese individuals; this in your pants. Asian women who grew up in western culture are not really any totally different from their Caucasian counterparts. my husband of 5 years, And partner of greater than a decade is white south african.

    It is exactly this much perpetuation of dubious, irresponsible, Sweeping generality that continue to create barriers between all of us. you are not an attitude like yours is more of an Al Quaida type thinker. Curiosity led her into that furniture pieces and she got stuck. Luk that there are numerous underlying issues with her self respect. an other thing, When we start saying things like come on my Asian brothers and stuff like that, We breed bigotry. I really enjoyed reading many comments.

  2. While women are exciting

    I Russian and currently pleasant China. I would say that this stereotype has a certain amount of truth to it, Not attributed to natural features but as a social behaviour.Russian/Ukrainian/Belorussian girls I met here are different from locals and “traditional western” Girls in how they approach make up and dressing up. While aforementioned look rather casual and dress up for special occasions, the first sort tend to do it every day, Hence a stereotype of fine Slavic girls.european men (And almost any Eastern Slav I met), in addition, Tend to neglect the look of them: it’s not typical to wear stylish clothes or a fancy haircut.either the woman who clearly put some thought into what she wearing, She pile on makeup, Made sure that her hair are somewhat personable and then there is her husband/boyfriend next to her with trackpants, A tired wife beater and Adilettes. So one expects Poles to behave like Belarusians but they suddenly don really, So you think they are rusing you purposely or were never as alike and just scheme purposely. Falsely thinking characteristics to be signs of equality, When they aren a Belarusian turns into a “corrupted” Crypto Pole the time he doesn quite agree with you, Because wondering why a Belarusian not be a nicer submissive mini Russian; Same logic can be applied. in my opinion it suits me any time I talk to strangers in Moscow, because praising of Belarusians feels kinda sleazy.Do you mean like yankee tourist loud?Like being very loud when angry and/or drunk, Not on on going basis. A Belarusian should certainly show a stoic demeanor, when Poles, Muscovites and Ukrainians rage around after a small provocation. Like here in Germany the general accepted every day look for both ladies and men is “feasible” tennis shoes, Jeans/leggings, T shirt and minimal makeup for teenagers, Jack wolfskin gear and tight, Easy managable hair for anyone over 30. In Bulgaria where the spouse of my family lives, I always feel hopelessly under dressed when all the ladies around me seem to wear nice dresses, high heel, And far more makeup on a daily basis in summer (Including my 75 year old grandma who to this day won go out in flat shoes or even answer the door with wet hair.)I suppose the men just look extra plain when they just dress normal and/or consider putting effort into their looks to be “lgbt, Unless it exploring gym. In western Europe it probably that the “Slavic macho humans” Look is often how criminals look here. So the guys often look like thugs to us even if they just perfectly nice people and wouldn hurt a fly.The same goes for the entire tracksuit thing as well, It something greatly reduce class, Thugs and so forth. look. by the way, Unless someone happens to see the guy on a football field, Out running or whatever maybe. The tracksuit kind of is wise there.Whenever when someone warm or I get too annoyed with my hair, I tend to cut it down to like a few millimeters because it just so much easier and I don have think of it at all for at weeks afterwards. Me not being the littlest guy around and simply doing that has sometimes caused people to think I was some kind of dangerous person, And when I started as a basketball coach I even got a “i believed you were Polish, From the kids on the team. Apparently he thought I looked scary and Polish a result of my size and short hair.So this is why, some of the “Style suggestions” Of Slavic men seem to be seen as a sign of being dangerous, A arrest etc. somewhere around here. That probably explains a lot about the misconception about the men at least. I think the mediocre ones covered the part about the girls quite well already, That also how i might explain it. I also think it about the contrast within men and the women though. When the guy generally speaking looks (in order to around here) Like a gang fellow member, And his girlfriend appears like she just stepped off a catwalk, The difference just seems extreme.Obviously there nothing objective about cultural differences in style choices, But I don think anyone ever claimed that stereotypes were main goal. Women here tend to put makeup on day-to-day and put great care in how they dress, though it is true guys, primarily older, Don give your damn (It changing now and young guys care a lot more about the look of them.)Whenever I visit Scandinavia or GB I notice women without make up, in the sweatpants, their hair in a messy ponytail. i think it great, You is able to go to hot russian mom a grocery store in your sweatpants and don feel like a freak. having Ukraon the insidee, You can see it with some other generations. much older (Not old more and more) Men care about their exterior visibly less, And they look and thus. The control is, You can look in the mirror and like a specific item, or perhaps gay.back in the day the manly standard, And even now, they only stuck in fear of looking too pampered. This fear is utterly uncommon. It near impossible to look pampered when you aren used to being athletic or getting the hair longer than 3 cm if any at all. Or donning something besides blue jeans + a polo shirt combo. Or simply taking a shower regularly in some acute instances.

  3. Totally agree. These Hollywood stars live in another world and don’t understand or sympathize with how this society actually works! ??????

Comments are closed.